Thursday, January 30, 2014

Haruki Murakami’s 1Q84 (2011)





I admit I had a preconceived idea about Haruki Murakami’s 1Q84 (2011) before I turned the first page. A literary friend had told me it was a ‘postmodern classic’ (yes, they exist), and that although it did seem a wee bit long, she was very excited to read it and wanted to share the experience. I bit.
1000 or so pages later (it seemed like more), I felt like I’d been bitten right back. 

Let’s talk terms for a moment. Postmodernism is a philosophical position that questions, or dispenses altogether, with traditional thinking or approaches. In literature, postmodern writers disregard long-accepted methods, sometimes upending genres and narrative structures. Postmodern fiction employs permeable boundaries between truth and untruth, fantasy and reality, and self and society. 

In 1Q84 (a play on Orwell’s 1984 – intertextuality is another typical feature of postmodern literature) a young woman named Aomame stumbles into a secondary reality where some things remain the same, like memories, and others are startlingly different, like the number of moons in the sky. Aomame’s counterpart is Tengo, a struggling writer and teacher at a ‘cram school’. He and Aomame are connected by their pasts, and are looking for each other across a gulf of eddying events. A fantastical element is introduced in the character of Eri, a nymph-like mystery girl, whose novel, The Glass Chrysalis, exposes the workings of unfriendly magical forces, and excavates the desires and dreams of its readers (literary themes – yet another characteristic of PoMo Lit!).This novel is an ensemble piece and all of the characters (there is an elderly woman, a bodyguard, a publisher, a cop, a spy) are carefully, but somewhat coldly drawn. They are like acquaintances; I recognize their features, but I don’t feel like I really know them, and I don’t really care to. They do act passionately; there is a noble vigilantism and a rescue from abuse, but there is a foggy flatness to events that makes the characters seem like paper dolls. 

The novel’s settings are sparse and minimal: a monk’s cell of an apartment, an empty playground, and a sterile room in an old people’s facility.  The characters reside only temporarily in these places.  Also, there is persistent repetition of those moons, and we are reminded again and again of the fact that the characters are in a different world now - a different existence.

In spite of all that, I kept reading. I almost felt like I didn’t have a choice. My friend had started reading the book, but then abandoned it. What kept me reading was stubbornness, curiosity, and certainly there was a romance that needed resolving, for better or worse, but that alone was predictable.  Even though I finished the book, I still feel like I am reading it… like I myself may have fallen into a two-moon world where there are no pictures on  walls. 1Q84 doesn’t read like a ‘classic’  to me, but it does have a beguiling mysteriousness that kept me awake while I was reading it, and for some reason, still keeps me awake at times.